Gender Representation in Corporate Annual Report Covers: Evidence from LQ45 Companies in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Authors

    Latifa Ummami( 1 ) Chandra Fitra Arifianto( 2 )

    (1) University of Pamulang | Indonesia
    (2) University of Pamulang | Indonesia

Abstract

  This study aims to analyze gender representation on the covers of annual reports of companies listed in the LQ45 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Annual report covers are understood not merely as visual identities but also as organizational communication media rich in symbolic meaning, reflecting the company's values, culture, and commitment to diversity. The method used is descriptive qualitative with visual content analysis of 45 annual report covers selected through purposive sampling. Human elements are divided into six groups: individual men, men with men, individual women, women with women, women with men, and non-human illustrations, which are then calculated for frequency and analyzed using gender equality and organizational communication theories. The results show that men are more dominantly represented, both individually and in pairs with other men (31%), while not a single cover features women as a single figure. Representations of women appear more frequently alongside men (40%) and only 2.2% within the female group, while 26.6% of covers feature non-human illustrations. Men's positions tend to be depicted as symbols of authority and leadership, while women are positioned as supporting figures. These findings indicate a symbolic invisibility of women in corporate communications, in line with Role Congruity Theory and global research on gender bias. This reflects the persistence of patriarchal structures in Indonesian corporate culture and highlights the gap between diversity policies and symbolic representation. Practically, the absence of balanced gender representation in visual communications has the potential to undermine a company's legitimacy in the eyes of global stakeholders and diminish its contribution to the principles of equality and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
L. Ummami and Chandra Fitra Arifianto, “Gender Representation in Corporate Annual Report Covers: Evidence from LQ45 Companies in Indonesia”, rubin, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–25, Dec. 2025.
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Latifa Ummami, University of Pamulang

Department of Management

References

Adams, R. B. & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

Backhaus, K. & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9(5), 501–517.

Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on Corporate Boards of Directors (pp. 25–40). Springer.

Catalyst. (2020). Why diversity and inclusion matter: Quick take. Catalyst.

Cox, T. & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5(3), 45–56.

Dewi, N. K., Suroso, A. I., Fahmi, I., & Syarief, R. (2023). The influence of women’s leadership on corporate sustainability in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), Article 2262706. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2262706

Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.

Goiyardi, D., & Joni, J. (2025). CSR, Gender diversity, and firm performance: Evidence from mining and energy sector in Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v17i1.11072

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.

Henderson, P. W. & Cote, J. A. (1998). Guidelines for selecting or modifying logos. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 14–30.

Holmes, J. & Marra, M. (2011). Leadership, discourse and ethnicity. Oxford University Press.

Hoyt, C. L. (2010). Women, men, and leadership: Exploring the gender gap at the top. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(7), 484–498.

Ismail, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2008). Barriers to career progression faced by women: Evidence from a Malaysian multinational oil company. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 23(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410810849123

Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447.

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Sage.

Liannita, D., Aridah, & Bonganciso, R. T. (2023). Gender representation on visual illustrations in Indonesian EFL textbook. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.31098/jefltr.v3i2.1776

Miller, K. (2015). Organizational communication: Approaches and processes (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The content analysis guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage.

Nielsen, S. & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.

Robbins, S. P. & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.

Ross-Smith, A. & Huppatz, K. (2010). Management, women and gender capital. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(5), 547–566.

Singh, V. T. S. & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.

UN Women. (2020). Women’s empowerment principles: Equality means business. UN Women.


Abstract views: 217 / PDF downloads: 175